?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Playboy retrospective

Here is a fascinating and fun link - it offers for free the centerfold photo for every issue of Playboy ever published. http://www.maw.ru/index.php?pb=s

What I find very interesting is how the clothing themes have changed over the years. As a foot fetishist, I could not help but notice that in the early years, most of the models were shown barefoot, but with bare chest only. As the years go by, Playboy gets more progressive by showing public hair shots, and then actual vulva, but at the same time socks, and then shoes on all the models.

Being the foot guy that I am, I think the trade-off wasn't worth it. But, that's just me.

Comments

( 17 comments — Leave a comment )
(Deleted comment)
boymeat
Jun. 11th, 2006 05:15 pm (UTC)
I am inclined to agree.
(Deleted comment)
boymeat
Jun. 11th, 2006 05:48 pm (UTC)
Verily so. *nips at yours*
(Deleted comment)
on_reserve
Jun. 11th, 2006 06:37 pm (UTC)
I'm also a sucker for the classic "who me?" playboy centerfold look of faux innocence. The newer crop don't look like they could be swiped and deflowered 'cause they look so deflowered already. I'm not a "foot person" per se but I have to admit that the toesies in the old ones *do* add to the overall cutie/charming effect.
cleovale
Jun. 11th, 2006 07:06 pm (UTC)
yes indeed.... http://www.maw.ru/pbp.php?p=741
the woman I was named after, according to both of my parents. ;)
(Deleted comment)
kahoki
Jun. 11th, 2006 09:25 pm (UTC)
I have to concur with the older images being more apprecited. The women in the 60s and 70s definitly appear to be more at ease with themselves than the over produced images of today.

Good call on the attire too, as I haven't been a fan of the baby doll socks and high heels as opposed to bare feet.
fetishcuriosity
Jun. 11th, 2006 11:27 pm (UTC)
foot versus shoe fetish
Not crazy about the socks, but like the shoes of course.

Score one for my side, lol.
boymeat
Jun. 12th, 2006 08:56 pm (UTC)
Re: foot versus shoe fetish
Yeah, but you'll take off the shoes when I tell you to.

So, in the end I win.
fetishcuriosity
Jun. 12th, 2006 10:30 pm (UTC)
Re: foot versus shoe fetish
ok you have no idea how delightfully distracting the thought of you ordering me to do anything was when I read this email at work, lol
boymeat
Jun. 13th, 2006 02:10 pm (UTC)
Re: foot versus shoe fetish
Actually, I do. Maybe I should start e-mail instructions... just to keep you on your... toes.
fetishcuriosity
Jun. 13th, 2006 10:46 pm (UTC)
Re: foot versus shoe fetish
*all smiles*

ohh.. what a thought! I can only hope....

I so need to visit NY soon!! Thinking maybe sometime between late July to early September, not sure.
petemosq
Jun. 12th, 2006 09:16 pm (UTC)
I was a Playboy Subscriber for 17 years, literally half my life. It just expired and didn't renew because I would barely look at it when it came. I'd agree to find most centerfolds lately to be less than inspiring, but I don't know if that has to do more with them than with me.
katestine
Jun. 20th, 2006 12:17 pm (UTC)
Did you by any chance keep the October 1999 issue? I promise not to drool on it :)
petemosq
Jun. 20th, 2006 07:22 pm (UTC)
Yeah I have most of them in storage. Next time I go in I'll see if I can dig it out for you. That way at least I can get my Paul Stanley CD back.;)
What's in that issue anyway?
( 17 comments — Leave a comment )